Very good point, Dale. I don't mind the need to take responsibility and "ownership" of whatever combination I load in any firearm. We all can benefit from such caution and conservatism at the loading bench.
It IS irresponsible of Lyman to produce such egregious variations in many of their mould designs, and to presume upon the safety margins built into firearms we use. Again, if we are to go about reloading and casting safely and responsibly, we owe it to the hobby field (and to ourselves!) to go slowly and deliberately while working up our loads to suit a given arm.
I don't LIKE Lyman's tendencies in this venue, but understand them and accept them as one of the costs of doing business. I think we should bring attention to these quirks so that newer casters and reloaders are better informed and can derive safer loads from Lyman moulds.