does anyone have any experience with the Ruger no.1?
Printable View
does anyone have any experience with the Ruger no.1?
Rob never owned one but would definetly consider it in the right caliber. The only thing that they don't have that I have a fetish for is a 26" or longer pipe.
Ken:fighting67:
All things considered, the Ruger #1 is a fantastic rifle. I have one in .30-06, 416 Rigby, and .458 Win Mag. Once you work up a good load you need to put in considerable practice in order to be able to get in subsequent shots rapidly. It's a matter of how and where you hold the next bullet to load.
Went looking at them some more last night and damn they do come with a 26" pipe but not in the heavy barrel I was looking at before.
Ken.
I was thinking of the stainless laminate bbz in 25-06.
or any ruger no.1 in 25-06, as long as it has a 26" barrel.
One thing you might want to keep in mind is that they are not difficult to rebarrel. Also, because they are so light (relatively speaking) you are more likely to see them for a good price used, especially in the harder-kicking chamberings. (It's no big deal to fit a decent recoil pad to them, either.) An old friend had one in .458mag that was absolutely brutal to shoot with full power loads, even with a boot recoil pad and a Past magnum shield between me and the rifle. Loaded down to the low .45-70 range (Trapdoor loads) with cast bullets, however, it was a pussy cat, very accurate, and lots of fun to shoot. He killed more than a few deer with it using those light charges and 300gr cast bullets. There is a warm spot in my heart for Number Ones, and also for the old Number Three's. If either followed me home, I would happily keep it. Older ones often had some accuracy issues, though, and more than one shooter has fallen in love at first sight with the beautiful walnut stock only to be disappointed at the range. (That, by the way, is how I learned they aren't difficult to rebarrel.) From what I have read and seen myself, that's really not an issue with the newer ones.
Would I run right out and buy a new one? Probably not. Aside from their classic lines and rugged dependability, if I personally were going out on a mission specifically to buy another single shot rifle at today's prices, it would be an Encore that I could be easily swapping barrels on if I decided that the chambering just wasn't what I wanted. (With a lathe and some skill, it might still cost less to get a used Number One and rebarrel it yourself, but it would lack the barrel-swapping versatility, and not everyone has a metal lathe in the basement.)
I personaly like the looks of the no.1 more than the encore. Another selling feature for me, is that it is a falling block.
I here you there on the falling block.
Was really looking at the 223 Rem in a Varmint.
Ken.:animal23:
Also with the no.1 you can keep the rifle shouldered while reloading. And you don't need to change barrels all that often, even though it is a nice feature, most times if you pick the right caliber you only need one rifle.
The problem with me is that I've picked so many "right" rifles that I'm running out of room for them. :fighting68: I quite agree with you on the look of the falling block, they're beautiful rifles and I drool just thinking about them - like I said, if one followed me home.....Quote:
Originally Posted by 257 ROB
But it's much easier to fit an armful of barrels here and there in the dwindling space of my gun safe than to cram in a couple more entire rifles at this point. ;) I will never be a "one rifle" man.....
One Rifle!!!!!!!!!
What kinda gun nut are you???
I guess I have way, way to many!!!!!!!!!
But I like each and everyone of them..
Just Raggin on ya bud..
Ken.
I also own many rifles and use every single one of them, but you can only shoot one at a time. I also like opening up the gun cabinet and having to decide which rifles get to come out today, but most times I grab the rifle I use the most.
Same here the longer it takes me to decide the better I like it.
I have a winny 94 in 38-55 have owned it over a year and got it to the range today it just had to be patient for me to play with it!!!!!!:fighting68:
The dang thing really shoots nice.:fighting67:
The only one I have left in the safe's that hasen't been shot yet is my 56-50 Spencer and as soon as I get my piece to convert it to centerfire it will make it's journey to the range.
I have the brass and the dies already.
I love choice when it comes to firearms.
Ken.:animal23:
Next week im taking the 270 on an elk hunt with my dad, it'll be a good time. The rifle actually shoots under .50 at 100 yds, the rifle is a marlin xl7. It'll have no problem dropping an elk.
270 damn that is one I don't have.......................
Ruger, Savage awwwwwwwwww the decisions a person has to make when buying guns.
Ken:animal23:
They are nice to shoot, accurate, and very fast. If I were you, I would buy one, unless you have a 7mm rm.
The bad thing with the Encores is that you need ( or at least I do) to keep a scope on each barrel... The #1's that I have are wonderful to shoot and very accurate. I did add limbsavers on both, replace the trigger on one, and had the other rechambered and a trigger job done on it, plus I had the safety ground down a bit so empty cases wouldn't hang up on it.
I've had a Ruger no. 1 for about 20 years and it is in 257 Roberts. It is one of my favorites. When I first obtained it, it didn't group, it patterned. After several factory loads and many reloads, I returned the gun to Ruger.
I can't say enough postive about Ruger, they fixed what ever was wrong, no note on the guns return, but I suspect they re-barreled it. The darn thing shots sub-MOA groups at 200 Yds.
Now if I had the $ to buy 6 more of them or so-----:D
I've owned two. Gave one to my oldest son and foolishly sold one to my best friend a couple decades ago. I really like them a lot. Just don't have one now.
EJ